In brief
By The Charter Desk, Agentic Governance Compare · Published 2026-10-01 · Vendor pages read 1 October 2026 · Editorial assessment
| Criterion | Weight | Credo AI | Lasso | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AI discovery and inventoryReasonsCredo AI: Credo AI describes discovering AI across agents, models and apps and keeping an agent registry. Source: Credo AI home page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: Discovery & AI-BOM is the first module listed on the platform. Source: Lasso home page · read 2026-10-01 | 12 | Credo AI | ||
Policy to runtime enforcementReasonsCredo AI: Credo AI says it enforces policy; runtime blocking of prompts, responses or agent actions is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: Policy enforcement and AI Detection & Response are described, and Lasso announced the LEAP CPU-based guardrail on 3 September 2026. Source: Lasso AI agent governance page · read 2026-10-01 | 18 | Lasso | ||
Testing evidenceReasonsCredo AI: Assess and monitor steps are described; adversarial testing or red teaming is not described. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: Automated red teaming is mapped to MITRE and OWASP, with closed-loop remediation and auto guardrail patching. Source: Lasso AI red teaming page · read 2026-10-01 | 16 | Lasso | ||
Framework mapping and audit-ready reportsReasonsCredo AI: The product covers discover, assess, govern, monitor and report against the EU AI Act, NIST and ISO. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: The governance use case describes an audit trail for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. Source: Lasso AI agent governance page · read 2026-10-01 | 14 | Credo AI | ||
Regulatory intelligence and expert supportReasonsCredo AI: A Knowledge Graph of regulatory intelligence and forward-deployed experts are both described. Source: Credo AI home page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: A regulatory intelligence feed or expert service is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Lasso home page · read 2026-10-01 | 10 | Credo AI | ||
Third-party AI governanceReasonsCredo AI: A Third-party AI Registry is named on the product page. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: A registry or assessment of third-party or vendor AI is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Lasso home page · read 2026-10-01 | 10 | Credo AI | ||
Languages and modalitiesReasonsCredo AI: Language and modality coverage is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: Language and modality coverage is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Lasso home page · read 2026-10-01 | 10 | Tie | ||
Pricing and trial transparencyReasonsCredo AI: Pricing is not published. Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01 Lasso: Pricing is not published. Source: Lasso home page · read 2026-10-01 | 10 | Tie | ||
| Total | 100 | Credo AI |
Tied: Languages and modalities and Pricing and trial transparency.
1 Policy
Policy: what the rule says
A Knowledge Graph of regulatory intelligence informs policies; Credo AI describes enforcing policy across agents, models and apps.
Source: Credo AI home page · read 2026-10-01
2 Control
Control: what enforces it
Runtime blocking of prompts or responses is not described on the pages reviewed.
Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01
3 Evidence
Evidence: what proves it worked
Assess and monitor steps are described across agents, models and apps.
Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01
4 Report
Report: what an auditor receives
Reporting against the EU AI Act, NIST and ISO is described, alongside a Third-party AI Registry.
Source: Credo AI product page · read 2026-10-01
1 Policy
Policy: what the rule says
The governance use case describes policy enforcement with visibility into every agent interaction.
Source: Lasso AI agent governance page · read 2026-10-01
2 Control
Control: what enforces it
AI Detection & Response is a platform module; Lasso says its LEAP guardrail runs on CPUs at under five milliseconds per decision (vendor claim).
Source: Lasso announcement, 3 September 2026 · read 2026-10-01
3 Evidence
Evidence: what proves it worked
Automated red teaming is mapped to MITRE and OWASP, with closed-loop remediation and auto guardrail patching.
Source: Lasso AI red teaming page · read 2026-10-01
4 Report
Report: what an auditor receives
An audit trail for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 is described.
Source: Lasso AI agent governance page · read 2026-10-01
Choose Credo AI if framework mapping and audit-ready reports and ai discovery and inventory matter most to you. Legal, risk and compliance own AI governance and need a register of agents, models and apps with assessments and reports.
Choose Lasso if policy to runtime enforcement and testing evidence matter most to you. You want red teaming that patches guardrails automatically, with CI hooks.
On our published weights Credo AI scores 6.00 against 5.60. The answer changes with your priorities: Credo AI is stronger on AI discovery and inventory, Framework mapping and audit-ready reports, Regulatory intelligence and expert support and Third-party AI governance, Lasso on Policy to runtime enforcement and Testing evidence.
Credo AI scores 4 and Lasso scores 8 on policy to runtime enforcement. Policy enforcement and AI Detection & Response are described, and Lasso announced the LEAP CPU-based guardrail on 3 September 2026.
Credo AI: Pricing not published. Lasso: Pricing not published.